fwbo strategy
fwbo strategy
three days of meetings at madhyamaloka to discuss strategy in the fwbo. this is a new meeting. it comes from the 'separation of powers' set in motion a couple of years ago, when the preceptors college and council took a step back, and we suggested 'the movement should run the movement'. it's taken some time for the chairmen's meeting to build the structures to do that effectively, but this year lokabandhu and vajragupta became the two full time development workers, and at the summmer chairmen's meeting at taraloka, this group was formed to start to discuss longer term strategy.
we met for three days. the idea of thrashing out a strategy for the fwbo might sound daunting. but the meeting, facilitated by amarketu, started out in the most personal way possible: we were asked to reflect on two questions:
when did you feel most effective, most connected, most alive?
what, in your direct experience, is good about the f/wbo?
from those very simple experiential seeds (mine involved a moment of meditation and a serious argument with someone) we managed to spin three days of discussion. the meeting will report back to the full chairmens meeting in germany in january, but the priorities that ememrged from our discussion included:
practice
A LAM RIM
widely shared & taught progressive framework of practice
pathways to depth
organising our embarrassment of riches
training processes
balance of understanding and practice
common path with individual diversity?
a perspective on dharma
giving central, non-dogmatic place to bhante
including new areas of study
emphasis on primary sources
'transcendental critique' applied to all our teaching.
all 'aligned' w/'shared understanding '
bhante in his study in sukhavati, 1980s
confident creative articulations of each of three-fold sangha.
(forest, settled and 'lay', cf reginald ray's buddhist saints in india)
teachings generated from within each
mutual respect, support of each by each
actively support all 3.
resourcing/supporting senior teachers + preceptors
research their needs ("impact analysis")
cultural shift to value them as much or more than administrators, organisers.
valuing and resourcing longer retreats
making them affordable
CONTEXT
better understanding and meeting
needs of people in team based right livelihood
spiritual, economic & vocational support of people in team based right livelihood
more points of contact with dharma
more specific 'engaged' projects
specialist groups: chaplaincy, stress, children, minorities
online teaching
greater diversity
good communication with other traditions
broader and deeper engagement wiht culture: science as well as art
'reith' lectures
team based livelihoods based on spiritual skills
resolution of issues in organisational history
17 xii 06